tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12623101.post2754421691319629774..comments2023-06-25T09:40:13.649-05:00Comments on Russell Glasser's blog: Evan Almighty: Blessed are the fictionalAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05324968314168283095noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12623101.post-42302953125726091792007-10-24T08:50:00.000-05:002007-10-24T08:50:00.000-05:00Of course god is real. He shows proof on toast, t...Of course god is real. He shows proof on toast, towels and trees all the time!Poodleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04722193899918659459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12623101.post-25446775815220040322007-10-24T07:25:00.000-05:002007-10-24T07:25:00.000-05:00Nothing of this story (Doubting Thomas)feels anyth...Nothing of this story (Doubting Thomas)feels anything but contrived. <BR/><BR/>You observations on the theme, running through a number of films is interesting to say the least.<BR/><BR/>Almost like a collective attempt to reinforce in ourselves that belief without question in ok , even desired.<BR/><BR/>Indeed who wants to be thought the fool for doubting Jesus/Church etc.Sean Wrighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14485575602984697926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12623101.post-67018426852567211022007-10-18T11:13:00.000-05:002007-10-18T11:13:00.000-05:00For some reason halfway through this post my brain...For some reason halfway through this post my brain took a tangent.<BR/><BR/>-- If we compare the 'displays of power' presented by 'God' in Bruce Almighty to those displayed by a character like 'Q' from Star Trek -Next Generation, what becomes strikingly apparent is that a display of God-like powers is NOT proof of BEING 'GOD' (at least not the more logistically problematic characteristics assigned to the biblical God--- omniscient, omnipreset, able to resurrect the dead and rule over an afterlife, etc)Allen Marshallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04764799647023692578noreply@blogger.com